Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Contagion Networks framework to analyze how biases from evaluators in multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems propagate through the network of agents. Through a controlled experiment with three distinct evaluator bias profiles, the authors quantify bias transmission using the Cross-Agent Contagion Matrix, revealing that biases consistently spread among agents with coefficients ranging from 0.157 to 0.352. Notably, they find that increasing the size of the evaluator committee significantly mitigates bias propagation, reducing effective contagion by 72.4%, which offers a practical strategy for bias management in LLM systems.
Evaluator biases in multi-agent LLM systems can propagate significantly, but increasing evaluator committee size can reduce this contagion by over 72%.
When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their systematic evaluation biases propagate through the agent network. We introduce Contagion Networks, a formal framework for measuring how evaluator biases spread across interacting LLM agents. In a controlled 3-agent experiment using DeepSeek-chat with three distinct evaluator bias profiles (structured, balanced, evidence-based), we measure the Cross-Agent Contagion Matrix Gamma_3 and find that evaluator biases consistently propagate between agents (gamma in [0.157, 0.352]), even within the same underlying model. We identify three propagation regimes governed by the spectral radius rho(Gamma_N), and demonstrate that homogeneous-model agents produce contagion coefficients 3-5x weaker than cross-model coefficients observed in prior work (MM-EPC: gamma approx 0.85-1.3), placing them in the suppression regime. We show that increasing evaluator committee size from k=1 to k=3 reduces effective contagion by 72.4%, providing an actionable mitigation strategy. We release the open-source Contagion Network experimental framework.
