Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AutoResearch, a framework that utilizes a large language model to autonomously develop learned policies for aerospace control problems while ensuring the credibility of results through a built-in verification process. The model iteratively proposes edits to training scripts, executes them, and logs outcomes, with results only credited after passing stringent checks against seed noise and verification methods. The approach was validated on two aerospace control tasks, demonstrating that the audited policies significantly outperform undirected searches, achieving robust performance well beyond the noise threshold.
An LLM-driven research agent can autonomously optimize aerospace control policies while ensuring result credibility, outperforming traditional search methods.
Spacecraft guidance, navigation, and control functions are increasingly realized as learned policies distilled from expert solvers. Developing such a policy is itself a research process: an investigator selects an architecture and hyperparameters, runs experiments, and must determine whether an apparent improvement is genuine or merely seed noise. This paper presents AutoResearch, a framework in which a large language model autonomously drives that loop for aerospace control problems, coupled with a credibility layer, built into the loop, that certifies each reported result against the problem's own measured seed noise. The language model serves only as the offline research agent that develops the control policy; the trained policy it produces is then deployed onboard the spacecraft, while the model itself never operates the vehicle. At each iteration the agent reads a plain-language problem description and the run history, proposes a single edit to the training script, executes it, and logs the outcome. No reported result is credited until it passes the same three checks: measured per-problem seed noise, reseeded verification of the best configuration, and leave-one-out pruning of the agent's edits. The same loop is applied, unchanged, to two aerospace control problems: a Clohessy-Wiltshire relative rendezvous and a safety-constrained collision-avoidance docking past a keep-out zone, each calibrated against a known optimal control benchmark. In both, the audited policy clears the measured seed noise by many standard deviations; an undirected search over the same parameters does not. On the docking problem the gap becomes categorical: undirected search yields no feasible policy, while the learned policy stays outside the keep-out zone on every seed.
