Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the integration of editorial expertise into the design of LLM-mediated knowledge dissemination tools, specifically through participatory design workshops with a Nordic public knowledge institution. By framing editorial alignment as a design practice within Participatory AI, the authors illustrate how editorial standards can be transformed into actionable alignment objectives for LLM interfaces. The key finding is that incorporating editorial authority not only enhances the quality of knowledge dissemination but also empowers editors to actively participate in the design process, ensuring that LLMs reflect the values of public knowledge institutions.
Editorial alignment can empower knowledge institutions to reclaim authority in LLM-driven information services, ensuring that AI reflects their values and standards.
The emergence of LLM-driven information services is reshaping the conditions under which public knowledge institutions operate, threatening to absorb the editorial function these institutions exist to exercise. While LLMs offer powerful new affordances for knowledge dissemination, editorial authority is challenged by pretrained LLMs that arrive already aligned with the values and dissemination strategies of their commercial developers. This paper investigates editor participation in re-aligning LLM interfaces to editorial standards through design workshops, in a case study where we design and implement an LLM-enabled encyclopedia interface with a Nordic public knowledge institution. We introduce editorial alignment as a design practice within Participatory AI, framing AI alignment as a design process and positioning the editorial standard as a design artefact that translates editorial practice and values into alignment objectives for technical implementation. Last, we discuss how editorial alignment can create space for ongoing participation and give editors agency in LLM-mediated knowledge dissemination.
