Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This research systematically evaluates various methods for tracking assembly states in Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) using Human Action Recognition (HAR) inputs, addressing a gap in the literature. By analyzing two diverse datasets and five state tracking approaches鈥攊ncluding logic-based, Hidden Markov Model (HMM), and neural network (NN) methods鈥攊t reveals that the effectiveness of these methods varies significantly across different tasks and conditions. The findings indicate that while NN and HMM methods excel in low-variability tasks, logic-based approaches offer greater robustness in more complex scenarios, particularly when modeling expected action durations is crucial.
Logic-based methods can outperform neural networks in complex assembly tasks, challenging the assumption that bigger models always deliver better results.
Human Action Recognition (HAR) is frequently investigated in Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) research to understand what actions have been performed and hence the state of a collaborative task. Accurately tracking an assembly state from HAR is however not fully investigated, and in realistic scenarios is not a trivial task. This research systematically investigates and compares methods for tracking assembly state using action recognition inputs. Investigations using two diverse datasets and five state tracking approaches, including logic-based, Hidden Markov Model (HMM), and neural network (NN) methods, show that optimal approaches are not uniform across different tasks and that different methods fail under different circumstances. Testing is performed using both simulated inputs with varying noise levels and realistic inputs from a HAR model. Results show NN and HMM methods can perform well in tasks with limited variability, but for other scenarios logic-based approaches can be more robust. Methods which model expected action duration are also important for tasks with repeated actions where no additional sensing is provided.
