Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper surveys the complexities of handoffs in electronic design automation (EDA), focusing on how design artifacts and decisions traverse multiple stages and organizational boundaries. It introduces the concept of handoff validity, which ensures that transferred objects meet acceptance conditions and carry sufficient context for downstream use. By analyzing 82 systems and categorizing them into stage-bound, flow-bound, and organization-bound classes, the authors propose a five-layer EDA agent communication protocol (EACP) to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of agentic EDA processes.
Handoff validity is crucial for ensuring that design artifacts maintain integrity and context across complex EDA workflows.
Electronic design automation (EDA) is inherently multi-stage and handoff-heavy. Design artifacts, flow scripts, and engineering decisions cross tool, session, and organizational boundaries before final implementation, signoff, or release. Each transfer carries explicit and implicit requirements that may not be fully captured by stage-local checks. LLM-based agents now invoke EDA tools directly, embed retrieved knowledge in executable scripts, and hand off state across sessions and stages. Once their outputs condition downstream engineering decisions, the transferred object must satisfy a handoff contract and meet the assumptions of its next consumer. This survey introduces handoff validity as its organizing principle. A handoff is valid when the transferred object satisfies the consumer's acceptance conditions and carries sufficient context, evidence, and provenance for downstream use. We review 82 systems and classify them into three boundary classes. Stage-Bound systems establish validity within a single EDA stage or bounded verification task. Flow-Bound systems preserve coherent workflow state across tools, invocations, and sessions. Organization-Bound systems maintain source grounding, provenance, scope, and admissibility across knowledge and authority boundaries. For each class, we analyze handoff contracts, handoff objects, coordination mechanisms, and open questions. These analyses motivate a five-layer EDA agent communication protocol (EACP), covering the agent discovery, agent message, tool invocation, workflow orchestration, and security and IP protocols. We aim to provide a common vocabulary and research agenda for trustworthy agentic EDA.
