Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
BAIR
Stanford HAICornellENSHarvardINRIAUniversity of CaliforniaUPennUT AustinJun 17, 2026arXiv:2606.18867This paper investigates the impact of strategic feature selection in algorithmic predictors used for resource allocation in high-stakes domains like healthcare, where input features can be manipulated. The authors find that simply excluding features based on their manipulability is often suboptimal, and they provide a detailed analysis of how feature subsets interact with ridge regularization. They propose a novel algorithm that optimally selects feature sets and regularization levels, demonstrating its effectiveness through a case study in healthcare payments.
Excluding features based on manipulability can lead to suboptimal predictions, revealing a critical flaw in standard feature selection practices.
When algorithmic predictors inform resource allocation in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, these predictors must account for strategic manipulation of input features. The typical solution is to redesign the predictor itself to explicitly account for strategic interactions. In practice, however, decision makers are often constrained to adjusting coarser levers within existing prediction pipelines. For example, healthcare organizations often select which features to exclude based on perceived manipulability, while using standard regularization procedures to shrink the coefficients of retained features. In this work, we initiate a formal study of strategic classification through feature selection and its interaction with ridge regularization. Our main finding is that excluding individual features based on their manipulability alone is generally suboptimal. We provide a fine-grained characterization of the performance of a feature subset under optimal regularization, yielding new insights for policy design. Motivated by this characterization, we develop a practical algorithm for jointly choosing the feature set and the level of ridge regularization. Through a real-world case study on a healthcare payments benchmark, we illustrate how our algorithm can guide the design of coarse policy levers in practice. Our results provide a principled, practical framework for mitigating the effects of strategic behavior in algorithmic decision-making systems.
