Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the application of learning-augmented techniques to exact exponential-time algorithms for NP-hard problems, a departure from the traditional focus on polynomial-time scenarios. The authors demonstrate that even a noisy predictor that marginally outperforms random guessing can significantly reduce the search space, leading to provable runtime improvements. Notably, the proposed algorithms operate under weaker assumptions regarding the predictor's accuracy, making them more applicable in real-world settings.
A noisy predictor that barely beats random guessing can dramatically enhance the efficiency of exact exponential algorithms for NP-hard problems.
The field of learning-augmented algorithms has demonstrated that machine-learned predictions can bypass worst-case lower bounds across a wide range of problems. So far, however, the focus has been almost exclusively on polynomial-time algorithms, where predictions improve competitive ratios, approximation guarantees, or running times. In this paper, we raise the question of whether predictions can push the frontier of exact exponential-time algorithms for NP-hard problems. We answer this question affirmatively by proposing a general approach that augments an entire family of state-of-the-art exact algorithms for a variety of subset selection problems. We show that a noisy predictor that is only marginally better than random guessing suffices to provably reduce the search space, and that the resulting runtime speedup scales smoothly with the prediction quality. Importantly, our algorithms require only pairwise independence of predictions or, alternatively, do not require the knowledge of the predictor's accuracy - both strictly weaker and more realistic settings than typically assumed.
