Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces EARS, a framework that enhances the reliability of sub-agent models in centralized multi-agent systems by implementing an inter-agent communication protocol for abstention. By enabling sub-agents to articulate their failure states and provide actionable rationales, EARS addresses the common issue of misrouting and hallucinated outputs in lightweight models. The evaluation in a large-scale e-commerce assistant shows a significant improvement in response pass rates from 68.5% to 78.9%, underscoring the effectiveness of explanatory abstention in improving multi-agent system performance.
Sub-agents can now communicate failure states and rationales, boosting response reliability by over 10% in complex multi-agent systems.
In large-scale enterprise settings, centralized multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly adopted, in which a coordinator delegates user requests to lightweight, domain-specialized sub-agents. While this architecture improves modularity, scalability, and cost efficiency, its reliability depends not only on accurate routing but also on sub-agents' ability to calibrate their responses to capability constraints. In particular, sub-agents built on smaller fine-tuned models often struggle with such calibration, leading them to over-answer ambiguous, underspecified, misrouted, or unsupported requests and produce hallucinated outputs instead of actionable feedback. To address this challenge, we present EARS (Explanatory Abstention for Reliable Sub-Agent Modeling), a production-oriented framework that reframes sub-agent abstention as an inter-agent communication protocol: a sub-agent does not merely abstain, but exposes an actionable failure state to the coordinator. EARS curates human-agent interaction data using an ensemble of calibrated LLM-as-a-Judge models, producing structured abstention labels and rationales under a taxonomy of sub-agent failure modes. These data are used to fine-tune sub-agents to detect failure conditions and return rationales for coordinator-level clarification, rerouting, or fallback. We evaluate EARS in a large-scale production e-commerce assistant supporting enterprise business intelligence workflows. EARS improves the overall response pass rate from 68.5% to 78.9%, demonstrating that sub-agent-side explanatory abstention improves MAS reliability.
