Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper establishes LLM Consumer Behavior Theory, a novel framework for understanding how large language models act as autonomous agents in consumer markets, challenging traditional consumer theory that centers on human decision-making. By integrating insights from classical and behavioral economics with advancements in Natural Language Processing, the authors analyze how LLMs reflect and execute human preferences, ultimately influencing market demand. The work synthesizes existing literature on LLM decision-making and preference elicitation, revealing critical gaps in assumptions about rationality and heterogeneity in agentic markets, while also outlining future research directions.
LLMs are reshaping consumer markets, but their decision-making processes challenge long-held assumptions about human rationality and preference representation.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that make consumption decisions on behalf of users. This shift raises fundamental questions for consumer theory, which has traditionally modeled humans as the primary decision-makers. In this paper, we introduce LLM Consumer Behavior Theory, a new field of study concerned with analyzing consumer behavior in agentic markets. Drawing on classical and behavioral economics alongside recent advances in Natural Language Processing, we formalize how human preferences are reflected and acted upon by LLM-based agents, and how agent-level decisions aggregate into market demand. We unify previously fragmented literature on LLM decision-making, human behavior simulation, and preference elicitation under a common economic lens, highlighting where assumptions, such as rationality and heterogeneity, may fail in agentic markets. Rather than providing empirical validation, this paper outlines the scope of LLM consumer behavior and identifies open research questions related to alignment, preference representation, and market dynamics.
