Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the contribution of textual reviews to recommendation systems by implementing three enrichment strategies on a Matrix Factorization framework. A learnable gating mechanism is introduced to balance collaborative and textual signals, alongside a cross-attention mechanism to highlight informative textual dimensions. The findings indicate that while adaptive fusion mechanisms enhance representation flexibility, the actual impact of textual signals is limited compared to traditional collaborative methods, emphasizing the dominance of collaborative information in performance outcomes.
Despite innovative fusion strategies, textual reviews add minimal value to recommendation systems dominated by collaborative signals.
Incorporating textual reviews into a Recommender System has become a prominent strategy for enriching collaborative signals with semantic information. However, the actual contribution of review-derived representations remains an open question, particularly when strong collaborative baselines are employed. In this work, we systematically investigate the impact of textual information on Matrix Factorization by introducing and comparing three enrichment strategies over a common collaborative backbone. First, we propose a learnable gating mechanism that adaptively balances collaborative and textual signals during training. This mechanism is applied to two distinct review representations: (i) aggregated topic profiles extracted from user and item histories, and (ii) full text embedding representations derived from reviews. Additionally, we explore a cross-attention mechanism that identifies and emphasizes the most informative dimensions of the textual representation before fusion with collaborative factors. We evaluate six variants: pure, enriched with topic profiles and text via gating; enriched with topics and text via gating; and enhanced with cross-attention over textual features. Experiments across multiple review-based datasets reveal that although adaptive fusion mechanisms improve representation flexibility, the marginal contribution of textual signals remains limited compared to the collaborative backbone. These findings suggest that, under typical rating-prediction settings, collaborative information continues to dominate performance, raising important considerations for the effective integration of semantic review signals into recommendation models.
