Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces GIST-CMTF, a goal-state inference layer designed to enhance Causal Minimal Tool Filtering (CMTF) in tool-augmented LLM agents by predicting candidate symbolic goals and addressing ambiguity in user requests. The method significantly reduces wrong-goal execution from 19.4% to 2.5% while achieving a remarkable 97.0% task success rate across various model backends and filtering methods. These findings underscore the importance of validating goal states in addition to tool relevance to improve the reliability of LLM agents in practical applications.
GIST-CMTF slashes wrong-goal execution rates from 19.4% to just 2.5%, proving that validating user goals is crucial for effective tool-augmented agents.
Tool-augmented LLM agents rely on runtime filtering to decide which tools should be visible at each step. Causal Minimal Tool Filtering (CMTF) reduces tool-choice confusion by exposing only the next causally necessary tool frontier, but it assumes that the user request has already been mapped to a symbolic goal state. In practice, requests such as "handle my appointment" or "take care of this email" may correspond to multiple possible goals. This creates wrong-goal execution, where an agent follows a valid causal tool path for an unintended objective. We introduce GIST-CMTF, a goal-state inference layer that predicts candidate symbolic goals over the same state-transition vocabulary used by CMTF, estimates ambiguity, and either applies CMTF or exposes clarification as a causal action that produces missing goal or state variables. We evaluate GIST-CMTF across seven model backends, six filtering methods, and 120 controlled tool-use tasks. GIST-CMTF achieves 97.0% task success, compared with 80.1% for top-goal CMTF and 82.9% for semantic-goal CMTF. It reduces wrong-goal execution from 19.4% under top-goal CMTF to 2.5%, while preserving the one-tool exposure of causal filtering and using substantially fewer tokens than all-tools exposure. These results suggest that reliable tool-augmented agents should validate goal state, not only tool relevance, before exposing external actions.
