Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the performance of stochastic linear bandits under various delay models, establishing near-optimal regret guarantees. The authors differentiate between loss-independent and loss-dependent delays, revealing that while the former incurs only an additive regret penalty, the latter presents significantly greater challenges, particularly in terms of dimensionality. Key findings include dimension-free penalties for loss-independent delays and matching upper and lower bounds for loss-dependent delays, highlighting the complex interplay between delayed feedback and linear structures.
Delayed feedback in linear bandits can fundamentally alter regret dynamics, revealing that loss-dependent delays are significantly more challenging than in multi-armed bandits.
We study stochastic linear bandits with delayed feedback under several delay models and establish near-optimal regret guarantees. Our results identify when delayed linear bandits exhibit the same qualitative behavior as multi-armed bandits (MAB), and when the linear structure creates fundamentally new challenges. Specifically, (1) for \emph{loss-independent delays}, where the delay does not depend on the realized loss (but potentially depends on the arm), we show that delays incur only an additive regret penalty. Under stochastic delays, this penalty scales with the expected delay, while under adversarial delays, it scales with the maximum number of outstanding observations. Notably, both delay penalties are dimension-free, improving upon the state-of-the-art results; (2) for \emph{loss-dependent delays}, we show that linear bandits are substantially harder than MAB: unlike in MAB, we prove matching (up to log factors) upper and lower bounds in linear bandits, whose delay penalty depends on the square root of the dimension. (3) for the \emph{delay-as-payoff model}, a special case of loss-dependent delay, we show that the optimal MAB guarantee, which depends only on the delay of the optimal arm, is also unattainable in linear bandits. Together, these results provide a sharp characterization of how delayed feedback interacts with linear generalization.