Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This chapter analyzes a questionnaire of 100 engineering students to explore their perceptions and usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education. While students appreciate LLMs for their support in writing, coding, and conceptual understanding, they also voice significant concerns regarding inaccuracies, bias, and the potential for overreliance. By framing LLMs as both "oracle" and "tutor," the authors highlight a disconnect between students' expectations and the actual capabilities of these systems, advocating for a more critical and context-aware approach to AI integration in educational settings.
Students' reliance on LLMs reveals a troubling "cruel optimism" that could hinder their development of essential skills and critical thinking.
Based on a questionnaire of 100 higher-education students, predominantly from engineering-related fields, and a critical review of recent literature, this chapter examines how students use and perceive Large Language Models (LLMs) in engineering education. Students primarily value LLMs for writing support, conceptual clarification, coding assistance, and brainstorming, while simultaneously expressing concerns about inaccuracies, bias, overreliance, academic integrity, and the burden of verification. Through an analysis of two dominant metaphors, namely LLMs as an "oracle" and as a "tutor," the chapter shows how these systems cultivate expectations of authority, expertise, and personalized learning that often exceed their actual capabilities. The chapter further argues that students' attachment to the promises of efficiency and personalized support reflects a form of "cruel optimism," where the perceived benefits of LLMs often depend on the very skills, vigilance, and expertise that students are still developing. Overall, the chapter argues for a purpose-driven and context-sensitive approach to AI integration in engineering education, emphasizing critical AI literacy, reflective assessment design, pedagogical caution, and consideration of broader ethical and environmental impacts.
