Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the effectiveness of subject-specific encoders in learning aligned EEG representations, addressing the challenges posed by inter-subject distribution shifts in EEG decoding. By implementing a hybrid model that combines subject-specific encoders with a common classifier, the authors compare its performance against standard baselines, revealing that the hybrid approach significantly enhances class distinctiveness and maintains robustness even without Euclidean Alignment (EA). The findings suggest that subject-specific encoders serve as an effective mechanism for improving EEG decoding, while also highlighting the need for better head selection strategies for unseen subjects.
Subject-specific encoders can enhance EEG decoding by increasing class distinctiveness and effectively internalizing alignment without relying on traditional methods like Euclidean Alignment.
Cross-subject EEG decoding promises more training data, but it also exposes neural networks to strong inter-subject distribution shifts. We study whether task supervision and architecture alone can learn subject-aligned representations. We replace a shared EEG encoder with subject-specific encoders followed by a common classifier, and compare this hybrid model with standard EEGNet, AttentionBaseNet, and CTNet baselines with Euclidean Alignment (EA) on four motor-imagery datasets. EA improves shared encoders by recentering subject covariances, but the hybrid encoder largely internalises this role: validation-loss curves and latent-distance analyses change little when EA is removed. Subject-specific heads increase class distinctiveness and place each subject close to its own latent manifold, improving most subjects while leaving a method-sensitive subset. These results support subject-specific encoders as a learned alignment mechanism for EEG decoding and identify head selection for unseen subjects as the remaining bottleneck.