Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
VibeThinker-3B is a 3B parameter language model designed to push the boundaries of verifiable reasoning within small model architectures. Utilizing a combination of curriculum-based supervised fine-tuning, multi-domain reinforcement learning, and offline self-distillation, the model achieves competitive performance on challenging reasoning tasks, including a score of 94.3 on AIME26 and an 80.2 Pass@1 on LiveCodeBench v6. Notably, VibeThinker-3B matches or surpasses larger models like DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemini 3 Pro, while maintaining strict instruction controllability, thereby supporting the Parametric Compression-Coverage Hypothesis that suggests compact models can achieve high reasoning performance without sacrificing general knowledge coverage.
Compact models like VibeThinker-3B can achieve frontier-level reasoning performance, rivaling much larger counterparts without losing controllability.
This technical report introduces VibeThinker-3B, a compact dense model with 3B parameters developed to investigate how far verifiable reasoning can be pushed within a strictly small-model regime. Building upon the Spectrum-to-Signal post-training paradigm, we systematically enhance the model through an optimized pipeline that includes curriculum-based supervised fine-tuning, multi-domain reinforcement learning, and offline self-distillation. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that VibeThinker-3B achieves frontier-level performance on highly demanding verifiable tasks. Specifically, it attains a score of 94.3 on AIME26 (improving to 97.1 with claim-level test-time scaling), an 80.2 Pass@1 on LiveCodeBench v6, and exhibits strong out-of-distribution generalization with a 96.1\% acceptance rate on recent unseen LeetCode contests. This effectively places it in the performance band of first-tier reasoning systems, matching or exceeding flagship models that are orders of magnitude larger, such as DeepSeek V3.2, GLM-5, and Gemini 3 Pro. Furthermore, a score of 93.4 on IFEval confirms that this extreme reasoning enhancement does not compromise strict instruction controllability. Extending our previous 1.5B work, these findings motivate the Parametric Compression-Coverage Hypothesis, which views verifiable reasoning as compressible into compact reasoning cores, while open-domain knowledge and general-purpose competence require broad parameter coverage over facts, concepts, and long-tail scenarios. This perspective suggests that compact models are not merely deployment-efficient substitutes, but a complementary path toward frontier-level performance in parameter-dense capability regimes.
