Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper argues that coding agents, powered by large language models, have reached a level of sophistication that renders traditional human code review obsolete. It highlights that these agents can achieve the same objectives as human reviewers鈥攕uch as quality assurance and error detection鈥攚hile offering greater efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The authors assert that maintaining a human review layer alongside coding agents is not only inefficient but also fails to leverage the full potential of AI in software development.
Coding agents can replace human code review entirely, achieving better quality assurance at lower costs and higher speeds.
Code review has been the primary quality gate in software development since Fagan formalised code inspection in 1976. For five decades, having a human examine and comment on a colleague's changes before merge has been a cornerstone practice at organisations of every size. Coding agents are large language model (LLM)-based autonomous systems capable of reading, writing, testing, and repairing software. We argue that coding agents have crossed a threshold of capability at which traditional human code review is no longer a necessary component of a software quality pipeline. Our argument rests on two claims: every stated goal of code review can be served by agents at lower cost and higher throughput; the naive integration in which agents write code and humans remain the mandatory reviewers is a dead end because it neither provides meaningful assurance nor scales with AI-assisted throughput.
