Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates whether a reader's selection signature in social highlighting is a stable trait or a transient state by analyzing the consistency of highlighting behavior over time. By tracking individual profiles over a period of up to 24 months, the authors find that while coarse-level selection shows some decline, fine-layer advantages remain stable, indicating that individual highlighting preferences endure despite temporal shifts. The findings suggest that personal reading identities are durable, with profiles built from earlier selections significantly outperforming non-personalized baselines in predicting future reading choices.
Readers' highlighting preferences are surprisingly stable over time, with personal profiles maintaining predictive power for future selections even after nearly two years.
Prior work on a social web highlighter located individuality in selection -- which documents a person chooses to highlight -- but measured it cross-sectionally. We ask the temporal question: is a reader's selection signature a trait or a state? We freeze each reader's first six months of highlighting as a profile and track its own-vs-other advantage on their later selections at growing gaps (to 24+ months), with negatives drawn from the same calendar era -- so supply drift cannot masquerade as personal drift -- at a coarse global level and at a fine level whose negatives and controls come from the reader's own interest neighborhood; the anchor cell reproduces the prior cross-sectional level (+0.188 vs +0.169), validating the harness. Four results. Within the same users, the fine-layer advantage shows no statistically detectable paired decline at any horizon (6-12 month retention R = 1.00 [0.85, 1.18], n = 212; the farthest bin is compatible with a modest decline; the only contrast whose interval excludes zero is the coarse layer at 12-24 months, about 13%). The signal is not reducible to repeated domains (~90% survives excluding all profile sources). Within-person drift is slow (a recent-half profile beats the old half by +0.042). Prospectively, personal profiles -- even one built from a reader's earliest documents, median 20 months before evaluation -- rank their next reads at roughly 3x the AP of every simple non-personal prior tested. We use"trait"operationally (a stable signature under continued engagement); the scope is heavy, long-tenured readers of one platform, and exposure is not separable from choice.
