Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a systematic comparison of various foundation model architectures for geospatial multimodal reasoning, focusing on their flexibility across different spectral band configurations. By standardizing pretraining protocols and evaluating models on the GEOBench benchmark, the authors reveal critical insights into the trade-offs between model flexibility, modality alignment, and performance on classification and segmentation tasks. The findings underscore the importance of architectural choices in developing robust geospatial foundation models, providing a roadmap for future research in this domain.
Architectural choices in geospatial foundation models can significantly impact performance, with flexibility and modality alignment being key trade-offs.
Foundation models are rapidly transforming Earth observation by enabling scalable pretraining across diverse unlabeled geospatial modalities. However, their architectural diversity ranging from encoder-only to encoder-decoder and masked autoencoding paradigms makes it challenging to assess performance trade offs in a consistent manner. In this work, we present an apples-to-apples comparison of leading FM architectures designed for geospatial multimodal reasoning, with a particular focus on flexibility across varied spectral band configurations. We standardize pretraining using identical self supervised learning objectives and training datasets, and evaluate all models under consistent parameterization on the GEOBench benchmark across classification and segmentation tasks. Our results offer new insights into the design trade-offs between model flexibility, modality alignment, and downstream task performance. By highlighting architectural strengths and limitations under controlled conditions, this study provides practical guidance for building next generation geospatial foundation models capable of robust multimodal reasoning.
