Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Arbor, an autonomous research framework that utilizes Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) to facilitate a cumulative research process by linking hypotheses, artifacts, evidence, and insights over time. By employing a long-lived coordinator and short-lived executors, Arbor effectively manages global research strategy while iteratively testing and refining hypotheses across multiple tasks. The framework demonstrates significant efficacy, achieving over 2.5 times the average relative held-out gain compared to existing models like Codex and Claude Code across six real research tasks.
Arbor's innovative approach to autonomous research enables a cumulative learning process that outperforms existing models by over 2.5 times in real-world tasks.
Scientific progress depends on a repeated loop of exploration, experimentation, and abstraction. Researchers test candidate directions, interpret the evidence, and carry the resulting lessons into later attempts. We study how an AI agent can run this loop autonomously over long horizons. We introduce Arbor, a general framework for autonomous research that combines a long-lived coordinator, short-lived executors, and Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR), a persistent tree that links hypotheses, artifacts, evidence, and distilled insights across time. The coordinator manages global research strategy over the tree, while executors implement and test individual hypotheses in isolated worktrees. As results return, Arbor updates the tree, propagates reusable lessons, refines the search frontier, and admits verified improvements. This design turns autonomous research from a sequence of local attempts into a cumulative process in which strategy, execution, and evidence are carried across time. We evaluate Arbor under Autonomous Optimization (AO), an operational setting where an agent improves an initial research artifact through iterative experimentation without step-level human supervision. Across six real research tasks in model training, harness engineering, and data synthesis, Arbor achieves the best held-out result on all six tasks, attaining more than 2.5x the average relative held-out gain of Codex and Claude Code under the same task interface and resource budget. On MLE-Bench Lite, Arbor reaches 86.36% Any Medal with GPT-5.5, the strongest result in our comparison.
Microsoft Research