Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study examines gender bias in swipe-based authentication using two datasets, BBMAS and ANTAL, with a focus on the performance of XGBoost and DenseNet classifiers. The classifiers achieved high authentication accuracies of 92% and 94%, respectively, while rigorous statistical testing revealed no significant gender differences in authentication error rates. These results indicate that swipe-based behavioral biometrics can provide reliable security without compromising fairness across genders.
Swipe-based authentication achieves 92% accuracy without significant gender bias, challenging assumptions about fairness in biometric systems.
Behavioral biometrics offer a promising approach for continuous authentication, but their fairness across demographic groups remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates gender bias in swipe-based authentication using the BBMAS (117 users) and ANTAL (71 users) datasets and evaluates XGBoost and DenseNet classifiers through False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR). XGBoost achieved authentication accuracies of 92% and 94% on the BBMAS and ANTAL datasets, respectively, while statistical tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and Wasserstein permutation) found no significant gender differences in authentication error rates across almost all experimental settings. These findings suggest that swipe-based authentication can achieve high accuracy while maintaining comparable performance for male and female users, supporting its potential as a fair and reliable behavioral biometric modality.
