Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RedAct, a framework designed to redact sensitive procedural skill traces from agent execution data while maintaining essential audit evidence. By constructing CapTraceBench, a benchmark with 75 long-horizon tasks and 154 skills, the authors quantify the risk of procedural skill leakage and evaluate the effectiveness of their redaction approach. The results show that RedAct significantly reduces normalized skill transfer from 44.7-67.1% to below the no-skill baseline, while ensuring high accuracy in behavioral watermark detection.
RedAct can cut procedural capability leakage from agent traces by over 44% while preserving critical audit evidence.
Users rely on execution traces to observe agent behavior, diagnose failures, and ensure accountability. These traces contain rich procedural detail, including tool invocations, intermediate decisions, and error-recovery logic. Yet this detail can expose private procedural skills, allowing downstream methods to recover key formulas, thresholds, and strategies without access to model weights or skill files. To quantify this risk and evaluate protection, we construct CapTraceBench, a benchmark of 75 specialized long-horizon tasks and 154 curated skills across seven domains. We also introduce RedAct, a protected trace release framework that localizes protected key information, rewrites traces while preserving verifier-critical evidence, and embeds behavioral watermarks for downstream provenance analysis. Across representative trace reuse methods, RedAct reduces normalized skill transfer (NST) from 44.7-67.1% on raw traces to below the no-skill baseline, while preserving audit evidence. Its standalone behavioral watermarks reach 93.6-100.0% true detection with a false alarm rate of at most 1.9%. These results frame public agent traces as security interfaces and show that selective redaction can reduce procedural capability leakage without removing audit evidence.