Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the transferability of tile-level performance to slide-level outcomes in digital pathology by benchmarking 19 state-of-the-art foundation models (FMs) across various tasks. The findings reveal a strong correlation between tile and slide performance, suggesting that tile-level linear probing can effectively predict slide-level success, thus streamlining the model selection process. Additionally, the research highlights that cohort size and the number of tiles per slide significantly influence transferability, making tile-level evaluation a practical preliminary step before full slide-level validation.
Tile-level benchmarking can reliably shortlist top-performing models, potentially saving researchers significant time and resources in digital pathology.
Foundation Models (FMs) have recently redefined the state-of-the-art in histopathology by providing robust representations for whole-slide image (WSI) analysis. However, selecting the optimal foundation model (FM) for a specific clinical cohort currently requires multiple preprocessing steps, followed by computationally expensive feature extraction and the training of a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) aggregator for every model. In this work, we investigate whether efficient tile-level linear probing can serve as a reliable proxy for slide-level performance, reducing the need to run full slide-level pipelines for every candidate encoder. We benchmark 19 state-of-the-art FMs on 42 slide-level and 16 tile-level tasks, comparing tile probing metrics against slide-level outcomes using ABMIL and Mean Pooling aggregations. We observe a high correlation between tile and slide performance across varying task difficulties, indicating that encoder representation quality is the primary determinant of WSI success. Sensitivity analyses show that transferability is stable across models and is more influenced by cohort sizes and numbers of tiles per slide than by average task difficulty. We also measure the agreement in best performing models between tile and slide-level tasks, showing tile benchmarks reliably shortlist strong candidates. Overall, our study indicates that tile-level benchmarking provides an efficient and practical first step for narrowing down candidate models, while slide-level evaluation remains essential for final validation on clinical tasks.
