Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces BenSyc, the first benchmark designed to evaluate conversational sycophancy in Bengali contexts, addressing a gap in existing research that primarily focuses on factual agreement. By analyzing 11,840 Reddit posts and 170,000 comments, the authors created a human-validated dataset with a detailed taxonomy of conversational responses, ranging from Invalidation to Escalation. Evaluation of over 15 LLMs reveals that even advanced models struggle to differentiate between empathetic support and excessive validation, achieving only 61.8 Macro-F1 in binary detection tasks, which underscores the need for culturally relevant benchmarks in assessing conversational AI.
Even the best LLMs struggle to navigate the fine line between empathetic support and harmful validation in emotionally charged Bengali conversations.
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly participate in emotionally sensitive social conversations, where responses may shift from balanced support toward excessive validation or escalatory alignment. Existing sycophancy research primarily focuses on factual agreement and instruction-following settings, leaving culturally grounded conversational sycophancy underexplored. We introduce BenSyc, the first benchmark for studying conversational sycophancy in Bengali social contexts. Starting from 11,840 Reddit posts and 170k comments collected from communities across Bangladesh and West Bengal, we construct a human-validated benchmark with binary labels and a fine-grained five-level taxonomy spanning Invalidation, Neutral, Support, Validation, and Escalation. We evaluate more than 15 open and proprietary LLMs on conversational alignment classification and response generation tasks. Results show that distinguishing empathetic support from reinforcement-oriented validation remains challenging even for frontier instruction-tuned models: the best system achieves only 61.8 Macro-F1 on binary detection and 61.7 Macro-F1 on five-class classification. In generation settings, several models frequently produce strongly validating or escalatory responses in emotionally charged situations. Our findings highlight substantial variation across model families and conversational behaviors, underscoring the importance of culturally grounded multilingual benchmarks for evaluating socially aligned conversational AI systems.
