Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Self-Harness, a novel framework that enables LLM-based agents to autonomously improve their operational harnesses through an iterative process of identifying weaknesses, proposing modifications, and validating changes. By applying this approach to three diverse base models, the authors demonstrate significant performance enhancements, with pass rates increasing substantially across all models. The findings indicate that Self-Harness not only optimizes harness design but also allows agents to adapt their interaction strategies based on model-specific behaviors, paving the way for more resilient AI systems.
LLM-based agents can now autonomously enhance their own harnesses, leading to performance boosts of up to 18% without human intervention.
The performance of LLM-based agents is jointly shaped by their base models and the harnesses that mediate their interaction with the environment. Because different models exhibit distinct behaviors, effective harness design is inherently model-specific. Yet agent harnesses are still largely engineered by human experts, a paradigm that scales poorly as modern LLMs become increasingly diverse and rapidly evolving. In this paper, we introduce Self-Harness, a new paradigm in which an LLM-based agent improves its own operating harness, without relying on human engineers or stronger external agents. We operationalize Self-Harness as an iterative loop with three stages: Weakness Mining, which identifies model-specific failure patterns from execution traces; Harness Proposal, which generates diverse yet minimal harness modifications tied to these failures; and Proposal Validation, which accepts candidate edits only after regression testing. We instantiate Self-Harness on Terminal-Bench-2.0 using a minimal initial harness and three base models from diverse families: MiniMax M2.5, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, and GLM-5. Across all three models, Self-Harness consistently improves performance, with held-out pass rates increasing from 40.5% to 61.9%, 23.8% to 38.1%, and 42.9% to 57.1%, respectively. Qualitative analyses further show that Self-Harness does not simply add generic instructions, but effectively turns model-specific weaknesses into concrete, executable harness changes. These results suggest a path toward LLM-based agents that are not merely shaped by their harnesses, but can also participate in reshaping them.
