Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the limitations of fully digital and partially digital e-assessment methods in higher education, particularly highlighting issues like didactic narrowing and constraints in large cohorts. It proposes a hybrid e-assessment model that combines paper-based, problem-oriented tasks with semi-automated grading, leveraging recent advancements in vision-capable large language models for improved handwritten character recognition. The key finding indicates that this approach enhances the validity, fairness, and scalability of assessments by significantly reducing misclassifications through a two-pass validation process.
Semi-automated grading of handwritten exams can enhance assessment validity and fairness while addressing the challenges of large student cohorts.
This paper examines the limitations of fully digital and partially digital e-assessment approaches in summative examinations in higher education. The analysis focuses on the didactic narrowing caused by closed question formats and on organizational, technical, and legal constraints that become particularly relevant in large student cohorts. As an alternative, the paper proposes a hybrid e-assessment approach that retains paper-based, problem-oriented examination tasks while enabling semi-automated grading. Assessment-relevant intermediate results are encoded in a structured answer format, entered by students by hand, and subsequently captured from table fields. The central technical bottleneck is reliable recognition of handwritten characters under realistic examination conditions. Recent vision-capable large language models, combined with a two-pass validation principle and comparison against a solution key, can reduce misclassifications and thereby improve the validity, fairness, and scalability of summative assessment.
