Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study benchmarks four self-supervised learning (SSL) feature extractors against four back-end classifiers for voice spoofing detection across multiple datasets. The researchers uncover significant domain bias in the ASVspoof 5 dataset, demonstrating that naive data scaling can degrade model performance, while also revealing that fine-tuning with just 8 hours of target-language data significantly enhances detection robustness. These insights highlight the necessity for both domain-aware and language-specific adaptations in developing effective spoofing detection systems.
Naive data scaling can actually harm performance in voice spoofing detection, while just 8 hours of fine-tuning can dramatically boost robustness.
Voice biometric systems face growing threats from spoofing attacks, yet the evaluation of detection models remains inconsistent across datasets. To investigate these unpredictable fluctuations, we conduct a comprehensive benchmark of four self-supervised learning feature extractors paired with four back-end classifiers. We compare the hierarchical local feature extraction of ResNet with the global sequence and relational modeling of attention and graph-based back-ends. Through multi-corpus training across three scenarios and six evaluation datasets, our empirical analysis yields two critical findings. First, we expose a domain bias within the ASVspoof 5 dataset, showing that naive data scaling actively degrades performance. Second, our cross-linguistic analysis reveals that fine-tuning with just 8 hours of target-language data enhances detection robustness. Together, these findings emphasize the critical need for domain-aware and language-specific adaptation in spoofing detection.
