Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces OpAI-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the progressive transformation of human-written text into AI-assisted content across multiple granularities. By generating nine sequentially revised versions of documents under varying AI coverage levels and edit operations, the study reveals that AI-text detectability is influenced by not just the amount of AI editing, but also the specific editing operations and the document's revision history. The findings highlight that intermediate mixed-authorship versions are often more challenging to detect than fully human or heavily AI-edited texts, revealing complex, non-monotonic detection patterns that existing benchmarks fail to capture.
Mixed-authorship documents can be harder to detect than purely human or AI-generated texts, challenging existing assumptions about AI-text detection.
As AI writing assistants become increasingly integrated into real-world drafting and revision workflows, many documents are no longer purely human-written or AI-generated, but instead result from progressive human-AI co-editing. However, existing AI-text detection benchmarks largely focus on final outputs and provide limited understanding of how AI authorship signals emerge, accumulate, or disappear throughout the revision process. We introduce OpAI-Bench, an operation-guided benchmark for studying progressive human-to-AI text transformation across document, sentence, token, and span granularities. Starting from human-written documents, OpAI-Bench constructs nine sequentially revised versions for each sample under predefined AI coverage levels and five representative AI edit operations, covering four domains while preserving complete authorship provenance at multiple granularities. The benchmark supports comprehensive evaluation with 8 document-level detectors, 7 sentence-level detectors, and 2 fine-grained token/span-level detectors. Experiments reveal that AI-text detectability is governed not only by the proportion of AI-edited content, but also by edit operation, domain, and cumulative revision history. Interestingly, we notice that mixed-authorship intermediate versions are often harder to detect than both fully human and heavily AI-edited endpoints, exposing non-monotonic detection patterns missed by existing benchmarks. OpAI-Bench provides a controlled testbed for analyzing whether, when, and how AI-assisted writing becomes detectable under realistic progressive editing scenarios. Our code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/VILA-Lab/OpAI-Bench.
