Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates the risks associated with autonomous driving by analyzing technical failures, ethical dilemmas, and regulatory frameworks using data from the NHTSA, DMV, and the MIT Moral Machines dataset. The study identifies perception and classification errors as significant contributors to accidents, highlighting the need for cohesive ethical frameworks and consistent regulations across jurisdictions. The authors advocate for an integrated governance model that aligns engineering standards with ethical considerations and regulatory oversight to address these intertwined challenges effectively.
Technical failures in autonomous vehicles are linked to ethical dilemmas and regulatory inconsistencies, necessitating a unified approach to governance.
Autonomous driving technology has the potential to reduce the large number of road traffic accidents caused by human error each year, but it also brings new types of risks that need to be evaluated from the aspects of technology, ethics and regulations. Based on public crash data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), disengagement reports from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), the MIT Moral Machines dataset, and a comparative regulatory analysis of five jurisdictions, we have found that the main types of technical failure modes are perception and classification errors. These account for a relatively large proportion of the reported accidents, and it can be concluded that there are different ethical frameworks for autonomous vehicle decision-making, and inconsistent regulations in different areas increase the uncertainty of widespread application. Generally speaking, the problems of technology, ethics and regulation are closely related and need to be solved together. Therefore, this paper recommends a more adaptive and cooperative governance approach that combines engineering standards, ethical discussion, and institutional supervision.
