Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces value diversity as a critical system-level evaluation metric for multicultural multi-agent systems, contrasting it with the traditional focus on value alignment. By analyzing responses from 19 cultures using the World Values Survey, the authors reveal that existing systems exhibit significantly lower value diversity compared to human societies and that diversity is largely uncorrelated with alignment. The findings indicate that social interactions among agents tend to promote consensus, further diminishing diversity, which has implications for the effectiveness of collective decision-making in diverse cultural contexts.
Current multicultural agent systems are not only misaligned with human values but also lack the necessary diversity, falling short of true cultural representation.
Multicultural multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed in globally diverse settings, where different agents are grounded in different cultural backgrounds. Existing cultural evaluation focuses on value alignment: how closely a single agent matches a target culture. Yet alignment is a per-agent property and cannot reveal whether a system, taken as a whole, preserves the cultural plurality it is meant to represent. We propose value diversity as a system-level evaluation axis for multicultural agent systems, defined through the dissimilarity between culturally conditioned agents' responses on a shared value survey. Using the World Values Survey, we evaluate 19 cultures and 18 backbone models across a wide range of system configurations. We find that diversity is largely uncorrelated with alignment, indicating that the two capture complementary system properties, and that current multicultural agent systems fall substantially below human societies in value diversity. Mixed-backbone systems narrow this gap but do not close it, and the gap persists across culture compositions and agent scales. Social interaction further erodes diversity by driving agents toward consensus, and a participatory budgeting case study shows that this homogenization narrows the breadth of collective decision-making. Together, our results establish value diversity as a distinct evaluation axis for multicultural multi-agent systems and reveal a persistent homogenization tendency in current LLM-based societies. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/iNLP-Lab/MultiAgent-Diversity.
