Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces the StyleGender dataset, comprising 74,000 images that explore the relationship between gender representation and artistic style across historical and generated images. By employing two novel Set Gender Artifact (SGA) metrics, the research reveals that gender representation significantly influences visual features in various artistic styles, and that style keywords in text-to-image generation can perpetuate these gender biases. Notably, generative models are found to amplify gender artifacts beyond their historical counterparts, highlighting the need for critical examination of AI-generated content.
Generative models are not just reflecting historical biases; they are amplifying gender artifacts in ways that challenge our understanding of artistic representation.
Artistic styles are rooted in specific socio-historical contexts that encode social hierarchies, including distinct constructions of gender. Yet in AI research, style has long been treated as a surface-level visual property: a filter of color, brushstroke, and texture applied to otherwise content-neutral scenes. We introduce the first dataset to investigate the interplay between gender representation and style in both historical and generated images. StyleGender comprises 74k images spanning 19 artistic styles, comprising art historical images with style and gender annotations, T2I-generated images under controlled style and gender prompts, and a semantically aligned set enabling direct art history-to-generation comparison. By proposing two Set Gender Artifact (SGA) metrics (PixelSGA and MaskSGA), capturing gender signals at the pixel level and in compositional structure, we show that (1) gender representation shapes visual features across artistic styles, (2) style keywords carry these patterns into T2I generation, and (3) generative models tend to amplify gender artifacts beyond what is observed in historical sources.
