Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a hierarchical framework for personalizing Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging Pierre Bourdieu's Theory of Practice, which organizes user behaviors into three levels: practices, habitus, and fields. By implementing the framework through $\mathrm{PHF}_{\text{Compass}}$, a lightweight and model-agnostic approach, the authors achieve consistent performance improvements on the Language Model Personalization (LaMP) benchmark across various tasks. The findings highlight the importance of understanding the deeper structures of user behavior for effective LLM personalization, offering a more nuanced approach than traditional flat models.
Personalizing LLMs through a sociologically grounded framework reveals the hierarchical nature of user behavior, leading to significant performance gains across tasks.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse domains, yet personalizing their outputs to individual users remains an open challenge. Existing approaches predominantly adopt a flat behavioral paradigm, aggregating user behaviors without an explicit account of how they are organized into deeper behavioral structures. In this work, we draw on Pierre Bourdieu's Theory of Practice to propose PHF (Practice-Habitus-Field), a sociologically grounded framework that reconceptualizes LLM personalization through three hierarchical levels: individual behaviors as practices, their temporal accumulation into stable dispositions as habitus, and shared regularities across similar users as fields. We instantiate PHF through $\mathrm{PHF}_{\text{Compass}}$, a lightweight and model-agnostic implementation based on a frozen LLM. Experiments on the Language Model Personalization (LaMP) benchmark demonstrate consistent improvements across diverse tasks, while further analyses validate the interpretability and extensibility of the learned behavioral structures.
