Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AI From the Margins (AIM), a methodological framework that empowers minoritized communities to actively shape the design and purpose of participatory AI systems from the outset. By applying AIM in a Dutch healthcare context, the authors conducted eight sessions that utilized narrative elicitation, co-constructed rule-making, and direct engagement with policymakers to center the lived experiences of women and non-binary people of color. Participants reported a substantive engagement that underscores the importance of grounding participatory AI design in the realities of marginalized voices, ultimately reshaping the objectives and criteria of AI systems.
Minoritized communities can redefine the purpose of AI systems when their lived experiences are prioritized from the very beginning of the design process.
Artificial intelligence (AI) can reproduce and amplify the structural inequities faced by minoritized communities. Participatory AI has been proposed as a response, but participation typically starts after problem definitions and success criteria have been set, leaving limited room for minoritized communities to reshape what an AI system is for. We propose AI From the Margins (AIM): a methodological stance that articulates the conditions under which lived experiences of minoritized communities can be elicited, centered, and carried forward to inform participatory AI design. AIM is not a fixed protocol; it articulates a set of preconditions that can be enacted through different techniques in different settings. We applied AIM in a Dutch healthcare context in eight sessions with 13 women and non-binary people of color and five municipal policy workers, namely through (1) narrative elicitation using the Biographic Narrative Interpretive Method (BNIM); (2) co-constructed rule-making; (3) participants' determination of whether, where, and how AI should be involved; and (4) translating lived experience into AI policy through dialogue with policymakers. In their reflections on the sessions, participants described the engagement as substantive and called for its continuation, demonstrating how preparatory orientation fundamentally grounded in lived experience shapes what participatory AI design is for.
