Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces SL-BiLEM, a structured learnable epidemic model that incorporates human behavioral responses to disease spread to improve forecasting and policy evaluation. SL-BiLEM decomposes effective transmission rate into factors representing baseline transmission, policy interventions, media influence, and compliance, with constraints enforcing monotonicity, smoothness, and bounded jumps on the learned compliance function. Validated on real-world and synthetic datasets, SL-BiLEM demonstrates improved forecasting accuracy and counterfactual recovery compared to neural-mechanistic baselines, particularly under policy-induced distribution shifts.
By explicitly modeling and constraining human behavior within an epidemic model, SL-BiLEM achieves a remarkable 20x reduction in out-of-distribution performance degradation compared to purely neural approaches when predicting the impact of novel policies.
Epidemic forecasting faces a fundamental challenge: human behavior dynamically responds to disease spread, creating feedback loops that induce distribution shifts at policy intervention points. This renders data-driven models unreliable under distribution shift. We propose \textbf{SL-BiLEM} (Structured Learnable Behavior-in-the-Loop Epidemic Model), leveraging physical constraints as regularization for robust extrapolation. The framework decomposes effective transmission as $尾_{\text{eff}}(t,g) = 尾_0(g) \times m_{\text{policy}}(t) \times m_{\text{media}}(t) \times m_{\text{comp}}(t,g)$, where monotonicity, smoothness, and bounded-jump constraints on the learned compliance function maintain predictive validity under novel policy regimes. Beyond forecasting, SL-BiLEM enables counterfactual analysis for intervention decision support. We validate forecasting on three real-world datasets (cruise ship, school influenza, and school-district COVID-19 surveillance) and evaluate counterfactual recovery on synthetic benchmarks with known ground truth. SL-BiLEM demonstrates: (1) 76\% improvement over neural-mechanistic baselines, with only 53\% OOD degradation versus 1142\% for neural baselines under policy-induced shift; (2) 100\% bootstrap CI coverage across 27 synthetic counterfactual experiments; and (3) Treatment Effect Accuracy exceeding 0.85. These results establish SL-BiLEM as an interpretable tool for public health decision-makers seeking accurate prediction and principled intervention planning.
