Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Content-Conditional Introduction Generation (CCIG), a task that grounds scientific introduction generation in a paper's core evidence. To address this task, the authors propose LECTOR, a Logic-Expression Co-Reinforcement Learning framework that constructs a logic-reasoning graph from the paper's main body and jointly optimizes for graph fidelity and narrative quality. Experiments on a dataset of Nature Communications papers demonstrate that LECTOR significantly improves logic fidelity (+26.7% in Graph Quality) and introduction generation quality.
Hallucinated citations and logical inconsistencies in AI-generated scientific introductions can be significantly reduced by explicitly modeling and optimizing a logic-reasoning graph.
AI Scientists have shown promising progress across multiple stages of the research pipeline, among which automatic scientific paper writing remains a formidable challenge. The Introduction writing is especially challenging, which demands not only linguistic fluency, but logical soundness and verifiable faithfulness. Most AI-assisted methods treat the task as text generation instead of reasoning and structuring, leading to severe drawbacks, e.g., hallucinating citations. To address this, we first formulate the Content-Conditional Introduction Generation (CCIG) task, which requires grounding the Introduction in the paper's core evidence. We then propose LECTOR, a novel Logic-Expression Co-Reinforcement Learning framework that can strictly follow the scientist's logic, add high-quality citations and keep structured expressions. LECTOR first constructs a logic-reasoning graph from the paper's main body to serve as a verifiable logical blueprint. Subsequently, it employs a Logic-Expression Co-Rewarding mechanism to jointly optimize for both the graph's structural fidelity and the final narrative's quality. We conduct a dataset from Nature Communications papers to assess our method. Extensive experiments show consistent improvements in both logic fidelity and Introduction generation quality metrics, e.g., Graph Quality (+26.7%), Citation Quality (+8.6%), and Paper Consistency (+3.3%). Code and data are available at https://github.com/Xiao-Youth/LECTOR.
