Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a method for directly evaluating harness optimizers, which automate agent creation by iteratively updating agent harnesses. They address the problem that current evaluation methods only look at the final agent performance, neglecting the quality of intermediate optimization steps. The authors propose "priority ranking," where optimizers rank harness components based on their potential impact, and demonstrate that this ranking correlates with the optimizer's ability to improve agents in multi-step optimization, using a new dataset called Shor.
Knowing which component to tweak is half the battle: directly evaluating harness optimizers via priority ranking reveals whether they're making informed decisions or just stumbling upon improvements.
Harness optimization enables automated agent creation by having an optimizer agent iteratively update the harness of target agents. Despite its success, current studies evaluate optimizers solely by observing target agents' performance gains. This indirect end-improvement evaluation neglects optimizers' actions at intermediate steps, which are often erroneous and hinder agent performance. Therefore, it is unclear whether harness optimization is driven by optimizers' informed update actions or simply trial-and-error. This necessitates direct evaluation of harness optimizers. However, evaluating harness optimizers directly is non-trivial and costly due to the lack of oracle harnesses. To address this, we present a simple, low-cost design to directly evaluate them, namely priority ranking. By asking harness optimizers to rank components (e.g., tools) in a given harness by their potential to improve/hinder agent performance when updated, our design quantifies optimizer ability at the step level without expensive rollouts or manual examination. More importantly, optimizers' ranking performance correlates with their ability to improve agents in actual multi-step harness optimization, establishing priority ranking as a reliable predictor of optimization ability. Priority ranking is enabled by Shor, a collection of 182 human-verified optimization scenarios spanning across domains, designs, and time stages. Codes and data can be found at https://github.com/k59118/Harness_Optimizer_Evaluation.
Microsoft Research