Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper identifies vulnerabilities of Time Series Forecasting (TSF) models to backdoor attacks, revealing that data entanglement and task-formulation shift undermine existing defenses. To address these issues, they propose TimeGuard, a training-time defense that uses channel-wise pool training initialized with time-aware criteria to mitigate signal dilution. Experiments show TimeGuard significantly improves robustness against backdoor attacks, increasing MAE_P by 1.96x compared to the best baseline, while maintaining clean performance.
Time series forecasting models are surprisingly susceptible to backdoor attacks due to data entanglement and task-formulation shift, but a new channel-wise pool training method called TimeGuard can effectively defend against them.
Time Series Forecasting (TSF) plays a critical role across many domains, yet it is vulnerable to backdoor attacks. However, backdoor defenses tailored to TSF remain underexplored, due to data entanglement and task-formulation shift challenges. To fill this gap, we conduct a systematic evaluation of thirteen representative backdoor defenses across the TSF life cycle and analyze their failure modes. Our results reveal two fundamental issues: (1) data entanglement induces channel-level signal dilution, rendering sample-filtering and trigger-synthesis defenses ineffective at localizing backdoors; and (2) task-formulation shift leads to training-loss degeneration, causing poisoned and clean windows to become indistinguishable at training stages. Based on these findings, we propose a training-time backdoor defense for TSF, termed TimeGuard. Our method adopts channel-wise pool training as the core paradigm and initializes a high-confidence pool using time-aware criteria to mitigate signal dilution. Moreover, we introduce distance-regularized loss selection to progressively expand the reliable pool during training and ease loss degeneration. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, forecasting architectures, and TSF backdoor attacks demonstrate that TimeGuard substantially improves robustness, boosting $\mathrm{MAE}_\mathrm{P}$ by $1.96\times$ over the leading baseline, while preserving clean performance within 5% $\mathrm{MAE}_\mathrm{C}$.
