Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates whether LLM hallucinations stem from a lack of knowledge or a failure to commit to the correct answer. By introducing a semantic notion of answer availability, the authors find that a significant percentage (16-47%) of Instruct hallucinations occur even when the correct answer concept is present in the model's generation-time distribution. The key difference between correct generations and hallucinations lies in the probability distribution: correct generations concentrate probability mass on a single answer, while hallucinations disperse it across alternatives.
Hallucinations aren't always due to a lack of knowledge; larger LLMs often "know" the right answer but fail to commit to it, scattering probability across multiple surface forms.
Hallucination is often viewed as a direct consequence of missing knowledge: a model answers incorrectly when the correct answer is absent from its generation-time distribution, and correctly when it is present. We test this assumption by introducing a semantic notion of answer availability that aggregates token-level variants expressing the same answer concept, and asks whether the correct concept is already available at the moment the model commits to an answer. Across Qwen and Llama models from 0.8B to 72B in both Instruct and Base variants, 16-47% of Instruct hallucinations occur with substantial probability mass already on the correct concept, and the rate rises monotonically with scale. Comparing such failures against correct generations with matched semantic support, the distinguishing factor is not whether the correct concept is represented, but how its probability is distributed: correct generations concentrate mass on a single surface form, hallucinations disperse it across alternatives. The same sharpening asymmetry extends across multi-token generation and is detectable in pre-generation hidden states. Together, these results identify a single mechanism: instruction tuning sharpens answer commitment with scale, making helpfulness and confident hallucination two consequences of the same underlying disposition.
