Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the capacity of linear associative memories, showing that the number of key-value associations that can be stored depends heavily on the retrieval criterion. For top-1 retrieval, where the correct target must have the highest score, the capacity scales as $d^2 \asymp n \log n$, a limit achievable by correlation matrix memory construction. The authors introduce the Tail-Average Margin (TAM) criterion for listwise retrieval, demonstrating a quadratic capacity scaling of $d^2 \asymp n$ and developing an exact asymptotic theory for the TAM empirical-risk minimizer.
Forget scaling laws – the real bottleneck in associative memory isn't storage, it's retrieval: forcing a single "winner" costs you a logarithmic factor in capacity compared to allowing a ranked list.
How many key-value associations can a $d\times d$ linear memory store? We show that the answer depends not only on the $d^2$ degrees of freedom in the memory matrix, but also on the retrieval criterion. In an isotropic Gaussian model for the stored pairs, we show that top-1 retrieval, where every signal must beat its largest distractor, requires the logarithmic model-size scale $d^2\asymp n\log n$. We prove that the correlation matrix memory construction, which stores associations by superposing key-target outer products, achieves this scale through a sharp phase transition, and that the same scaling is necessary for any linear memory. Thus the logarithm is the intrinsic extreme-value price of winner-take-all decoding. We next consider listwise retrieval, where the correct target need not be the unique top-scoring item but should remain among the strongest candidates. To formalize this regime, we propose the Tail-Average Margin (TAM), a convex upper-tail criterion that certifies inclusion of the correct target in a controlled candidate list. Under this listwise retrieval criterion, the capacity follows the quadratic scale $d^2\asymp n$. At load $n/d^2\toα$, we develop an exact asymptotic theory for the TAM empirical-risk minimizer through a two-parameter scalar variational principle. The theory has a rich phenomenology: in the ridgeless limit it yields a closed-form critical load separating satisfiable and unsatisfiable phases, and it predicts the limiting laws of true scores, competitor scores, margins, and percentile profiles. Finally, a small-tail extrapolation further leads to the conjectural sharp top-1 threshold $d^2\sim 2n\log n$.
BAIR