Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Claw-Eval-Live is introduced as a live benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in real-world workflows, using a refreshable signal layer derived from public workflow-demand signals like ClawHub Top-500 skills. The benchmark assesses agents on 105 tasks across business services and local workspaces, capturing detailed execution traces and employing deterministic checks and structured LLM judging for grading. Evaluation of 13 frontier models reveals that the best model only passes 66.7% of tasks, highlighting persistent challenges in HR, management, and multi-system business workflows.
LLM agents still fail to reliably automate real-world workflows, with even the best models succeeding on only two-thirds of tasks in a new live benchmark.
LLM agents are expected to complete end-to-end units of work across software tools, business services, and local workspaces. Yet many agent benchmarks freeze a curated task set at release time and grade mainly the final response, making it difficult to evaluate agents against evolving workflow demand or verify whether a task was executed. We introduce Claw-Eval-Live, a live benchmark for workflow agents that separates a refreshable signal layer, updated across releases from public workflow-demand signals, from a reproducible, time-stamped release snapshot. Each release is constructed from public workflow-demand signals, with ClawHub Top-500 skills used in the current release, and materialized as controlled tasks with fixed fixtures, services, workspaces, and graders. For grading, Claw-Eval-Live records execution traces, audit logs, service state, and post-run workspace artifacts, using deterministic checks when evidence is sufficient and structured LLM judging only for semantic dimensions. The release contains 105 tasks spanning controlled business services and local workspace repair, and evaluates 13 frontier models under a shared public pass rule. Experiments reveal that reliable workflow automation remains far from solved: the leading model passes only 66.7% of tasks and no model reaches 70%. Failures are structured by task family and execution surface, with HR, management, and multi-system business workflows as persistent bottlenecks and local workspace repair comparatively easier but unsaturated. Leaderboard rank alone is insufficient because models with similar pass rates can diverge in overall completion, and task-level discrimination concentrates in a middle band of tasks. Claw-Eval-Live suggests that workflow-agent evaluation should be grounded twice, in fresh external demand and in verifiable agent action.
