Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the potential for the term "trust" to be trivialized in the context of AI, drawing a parallel to the misuse of "love" in advertising. It proposes a framework of "trust pillars" to facilitate a more actionable and measurable discussion of trust in AI systems. The author suggests leveraging the explicit interfaces of agentic systems to create "trust vectors" for better understanding and management of AI trustworthiness.
Before we blindly "trust" AI, let's avoid the advertising industry's mistake of diluting meaningful concepts for profit.
Advertising uses love to sell stuff, like nylons. It also uses the word"love"in trivialising ways -- do you"love"your oven? When I hear about trust in the context of AI, especially agentic, I hope we don't do to trust what advertising has done to love. But what is trust? Can we discuss it in actionable and measurable ways in the context of AI? Thus I suggest a number of"trust pillars", hoping to start a communal conversation, across computing and beyond, to civil society. I also suggest that agentic systems may be a blessing in disguise, as we may be able to turn their explicit interfaces into"trust vectors".
