Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a 3-dimensional framework (scale, duration, modality) for mapping the methodological space of classroom interaction research, highlighting the trade-offs inherent in different approaches. The framework is illustrated through a comparative analysis of two dialogic teaching studies and researcher interviews, revealing how methodological choices influence the operationalization of concepts, visibility of mechanisms, and translation to practical application. Finally, the paper explores how AI technologies are expanding this methodological space and how the framework can inform future research and tool development in this area.
Understanding the scale, duration, and modality of classroom interaction research can unlock insights into what's truly actionable in education.
Research on classroom interaction has long been divided between large-scale observation and in-depth ethnographic work. We propose a framework mapping this methodological space along three dimensions--scale, duration, and modality--where a study's position shapes what it reveals and obscures. We illustrate it through contrasting studies of dialogic teaching--Howe et al. (2019) and Snell and Lefstein (2018)--and an interview with the lead researchers, organized around three questions: what can be operationalized, what mechanisms become visible, and what translates to practice. We then examine how AI is expanding this space and how the framework can guide research and tool design.
Stanford HAI