Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper extends a neuro-symbolic causal framework with a meta-level layer for mitigating goal misspecification and enabling scalable rule maintenance in safety-critical systems. The framework uses LLMs to synthesize first-order logic rules from natural language goals, and a verification pipeline to ensure syntax, consistency, and safety before integrating rules into a knowledge base. Evaluations in autonomous driving scenarios demonstrate the pipeline's ability to derive minimal rule sets and formalize them as logical constraints from human-specified goals.
LLMs can synthesize formal safety rules from natural language goals, offering a path to more robust and verifiable AI systems in safety-critical domains.
Rule-based systems remain central in safety-critical domains but often struggle with scalability, brittleness, and goal misspecification. These limitations can lead to reward hacking and failures in formal verification, as AI systems tend to optimize for narrow objectives. In previous research, we developed a neuro-symbolic causal framework that integrates first-order logic abduction trees, structural causal models, and deep reinforcement learning within a MAPE-K loop to provide explainable adaptations under distribution shifts. In this paper, we extend that framework by introducing a meta-level layer designed to mitigate goal misspecification and support scalable rule maintenance. This layer consists of a Goal/Rule Synthesizer and a Rule Verification Engine, which iteratively refine a formal rule theory from high-level natural-language goals and principles provided by human experts. The synthesis pipeline employs large language models (LLMs) to: (1) decompose goals into candidate causes, (2) consolidate semantics to remove redundancies, (3) translate them into candidate first-order rules, and (4) compose necessary and sufficient causal sets. The verification pipeline then performs (1) syntax and schema validation, (2) logical consistency analysis, and (3) safety and invariant checks before integrating verified rules into the knowledge base. We evaluated our approach with a proof-of-concept implementation in two autonomous driving scenarios. Results indicate that, given human-specified goals and principles, the pipeline can successfully derive minimal necessary and sufficient rule sets and formalize them as logical constraints. These findings suggest that the pipeline supports incremental, modular, and traceable rule synthesis grounded in established legal and safety principles.
