Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the use of gradient-based attribution within differentiable AI weather models as a signal for valuing individual data contributions in participatory weather sensing networks. They evaluate the fidelity, calibration, cost, and vulnerability to gaming of gradient attribution on gridded GFS analysis inputs across 400+ configurations. Results show attribution captures near-optimal sensor placement utility and provides monotonically faithful payments, but is susceptible to inflation via adversarial inputs, necessitating external baseline data for detection.
Gradient attribution in AI weather models offers a computationally validated, model-informed approach to reward allocation in participatory weather sensing, but beware: adversarial inputs can game the system.
Large-scale IoT weather sensing networks require incentive mechanisms to sustain participation, yet determining how much value individual data contributions bring to the network remains an open problem. Existing approaches address data quality but not data valuation; in operational meteorology, adjoint-based methods derive value from the forecast model itself but require full data assimilation infrastructure. We propose to utilise differentiable AI weather models to fill this gap and characterise gradient-based attribution on gridded GFS analysis inputs as a candidate value signal, evaluating fidelity, calibration, cost, and gaming vulnerability across more than 400 configurations. Attribution captures near-optimal sensor placement utility with monotonically faithful payments, but can be inflated by adversarial inputs, with detection requiring external baseline data. These findings establish gradient attribution as a computationally validated signal for model-informed reward allocation in participatory weather sensing.
