Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces xmemory, a schema-grounded memory system for AI agents that prioritizes reliable storage and retrieval of structured information over unstructured recall. The system employs an iterative write path involving object detection, field detection, and field-value extraction, coupled with validation gates and stateful prompt control, to ensure data integrity. Experiments demonstrate that xmemory significantly outperforms existing memory systems and LLMs on structured extraction and end-to-end memory benchmarks, achieving up to 97.10% F1 score and 95.2% accuracy on application-level tasks.
For AI agents needing reliable facts and stateful computation, *how* you structure memory beats simply scaling retrieval or model size.
Persistent AI memory is often reduced to a retrieval problem: store prior interactions as text, embed them, and ask the model to recover relevant context later. This design is useful for thematic recall, but it is mismatched to the kinds of memory that agents need in production: exact facts, current state, updates and deletions, aggregation, relations, negative queries, and explicit unknowns. These operations require memory to behave less like search and more like a system of record. This paper argues that reliable external AI memory must be schema-grounded. Schemas define what must be remembered, what may be ignored, and which values must never be inferred. We present an iterative, schema-aware write path that decomposes memory ingestion into object detection, field detection, and field-value extraction, with validation gates, local retries, and stateful prompt control. The result shifts interpretation from the read path to the write path: reads become constrained queries over verified records rather than repeated inference over retrieved prose. We evaluate this design on structured extraction and end-to-end memory benchmarks. On the extraction benchmark, the judge-in-the-loop configuration reaches 90.42% object-level accuracy and 62.67% output accuracy, above all tested frontier structured-output baselines. On our end-to-end memory benchmark, xmemory reaches 97.10% F1, compared with 80.16%-87.24% across the third-party baselines. On the application-level task, xmemory reaches 95.2% accuracy, outperforming specialised memory systems, code-generated Markdown harnesses, and customer-facing frontier-model application harnesses. The results show that, for memory workloads requiring stable facts and stateful computation, architecture matters more than retrieval scale or model strength alone.
