Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates Requirements Debt (ReD) in AI-enabled automotive perception systems, a critical but underexplored form of technical debt arising from continuously evolving requirements. Through 16 interviews with experts from automotive companies and research institutes, the research identifies key ReD mechanisms driven by both functional and non-functional requirement evolution. The findings reveal that evolving requirements lead to issues like semantic drift, validation backlogs, assurance lag, and compliance misalignment, ultimately impacting auditability and reliability.
The hidden cost of rapidly iterating on AI-enabled perception systems? A growing "Requirements Debt" that threatens auditability, reliability, and certification readiness.
AI integration in automotive perception systems shifts requirements from static specifications to continuously evolving entities shaped by data, models, and operating contexts. When such changes are not consistently documented, validated, and traced, they accumulate as Requirements Debt (ReD), an underexplored but critical subtype of technical debt. This study conceptualises and empirically investigates how evolving functional and non-functional requirements create and propagate ReD across the AI-enabled automotive perception system lifecycle. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with experts from 13 international automotive companies and 3 European research institutes, and analysed the data using thematic analysis. As one of the first empirical studies connecting technical debt theory with RE4AI, the work identifies key ReD mechanisms. Evolving functional requirements (e.g., algorithm updates, sensor fusion, architectural changes, real-time constraints) drive semantic drift, validation backlogs, and integration debt when verification lags behind rapid iteration. In parallel, evolving non-functional requirements (e.g., safety, cybersecurity, reliability, scalability, transparency, trustworthiness) create assurance lag, compliance misalignment, and transparency and reliability debt as standards and ethical expectations shift. These interacting mechanisms propagate ReD across data, models, and system artefacts, undermining auditability, reliability, and certification readiness in safety-critical perception systems.
