Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of correcting indentation size effect (ISE) in nanoindentation measurements of steels, which is crucial for accurate mechanical characterization of volume-constrained materials. They use a small dataset of ~700 experimental indentations from three steel specimens, augmented with physics-guided variations, to train machine learning models for predicting reference hardness. A constrained neural network achieved the best performance, with RMSE = 0.470 GPa and MAPE = 5.4% on a quarantined steel specimen, demonstrating stable estimates even in the shallow regime, outperforming traditional Nix-Gao analysis.
You can accurately predict steel hardness from nanoindentation data with a tiny dataset and some clever physics-based data augmentation, even when traditional methods fail.
Shallow nanoindentation enables mechanical characterization of thin films, individual phases and other volume-constrained materials, but measured hardness is often inflated by the indentation size effect (ISE), contact-area errors and tip-geometry artifacts. Classical ISE corrections such as the Nix-Gao require a deep linear regime and are unreliable when only shallow measurements are used. This study investigates how a small experimental dataset can be used to predict a reference hardness with physics-guided feature engineering and augmentation. Approximately 700 experimental indentations were collected from three steel reference specimens covering a hardness range of 2-6.5 GPa and augmented using physically motivated variations representing instrumental noise, session-level drift, and local multiphase boundary blending. The input space combined Oliver-Pharr values with mechanics descriptors, including indentation work partitioning, ($H\text{/}E_{r}$), and the area-invariant compliance proxy ($P_{\max}\text{/}S^{2}$). Ridge Regression (RR), Random Forest, XGBoost, and Neural Networks (NN) were evaluated using a quarantined fourth steel specimen tested at staggered loads. The hardness mapping was nonlinear: RR failed, whereas nonlinear models achieved ($R^2>0.98$) internally. A constrained (64-8-64) NN gave the best results, reaching RMSE = 0.470 GPa, MAPE = 5.4% on the quarantined steel. Unlike Nix-Gao analysis, the NN produced stable estimates in the shallow regime. SHAP and latent-space analysis showed reliance on area-invariant and energy-based descriptors. The results demonstrate the feasibility of a this workflow for ISE correction in steels using small datasets and suggest a pathway toward data-efficient characterization of any volume constrained materials.
