Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper demonstrates that all predicates expressible in monadic Presburger arithmetic can be decided by population protocols that are robust against adversarial crash failures. It builds upon prior work showing that population protocols can decide predicates expressible in Presburger arithmetic and the recent introduction of protocol robustness against crash failures. The authors also analyze the state complexity cost of robustness, showing it is at least double exponential in the size of the predicate, and that existing robust protocols for threshold predicates have optimal state complexity.
Robustly deciding even simple arithmetic predicates in distributed systems comes at a steep cost: state complexity explodes double-exponentially.
Population protocols are a model of distributed computation in which a collection of indistinguishable finite-state agents interact randomly in pairs to decide a predicate of their initial configuration. The agents decide by achieving a stable consensus on whether the predicate holds or not. It is known that population protocols can decide exactly the predicates expressible in Presburger arithmetic. Recently, Lossin et al. have introduced a notion of protocol robustness against adversarial crash failures. They show that all atomic Presburger predicates can be decided by robust protocols, and ask whether the same holds for every Presburger predicate. We make progress towards settling this question by proving that all predicates expressible in monadic Presburger arithmetic have robust protocols. In addition, we analyze the cost of robustness in terms of state complexity. We study the ratio between the number of states of the smallest robust protocol for a given predicate and the smallest protocol for it. We show that the cost of robustness is at least double exponential in the size of the predicate, and prove that the robust protocols by Lossin et al. for threshold predicates x>= k have optimal state complexity.
