Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how network architecture (modular vs. single-module), task similarity, and representational dimensionality interact to affect continual learning performance. They find that modular architectures only outperform single-module architectures in low-dimensional regimes, where representations are more constrained. In these regimes, modular networks exhibit a graded alignment of task-specific subspaces based on task similarity, a geometry absent in single-module networks.
Modular architectures in continual learning only matter when representational dimensionality is low, revealing that dimensionality acts as a key control knob for the benefits of structural separation.
To preserve previously learned representations, continual learning systems must strike a balance between plasticity, the ability to acquire new knowledge, and stability. This stability-plasticity dilemma affects how representations can be reused across tasks: shared structure enables transfer when tasks are similar but may also induce interference when new learning disrupts existing representations. However, it remains unclear when and why structural separation influences this trade-off. In this study, we examine how network architecture, task similarity, and representational dimensionality jointly shape learning in a sequential task paradigm inspired by transfer-interference studies. We compare a task-partitioned modular recurrent network with a single-module baseline by systematically varying task similarity (low, medium, high) and the scale of weight initialization, which induces different learning regimes that we empirically characterize through the effective dimensionality of the learned representations. We find that architecture has minimal impact in high-dimensional regimes where representations are sufficiently unconstrained to accommodate multiple tasks without strong interference. In contrast, in lower-dimensional (rich) regimes, architectural separation is decisive: modular networks exhibit graded alignment of task-specific subspaces with overlap for similar tasks, partial orthogonalization for moderately dissimilar tasks, and stronger separation for dissimilar tasks. This graded geometry is absent in the single network baseline. Our findings suggest that representational dimensionality acts as a key organizing variable governing when structural separation becomes functionally relevant, and highlight adaptive geometry as a central principle for designing continual learning systems.
