Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces two novel metrics, POSER (Part-of-speech Error Rate) and EmbER (Embedding Error Rate), to provide a more nuanced evaluation of ASR systems beyond WER. These metrics assess morpho-syntactic and semantic aspects of transcribed words, respectively, to better understand the impact of language model rescoring. Experiments demonstrate the utility of POSER and EmbER in highlighting the linguistic contributions of language models during ASR rescoring.
WER hides the real story: new metrics reveal how language model rescoring in ASR impacts grammatical correctness and semantic accuracy.
Evaluating automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems is a classical but difficult and still open problem, which often boils down to focusing only on the word error rate (WER). However, this metric suffers from many limitations and does not allow an in-depth analysis of automatic transcription errors. In this paper, we propose to study and understand the impact of rescoring using language models in ASR systems by means of several metrics often used in other natural language processing (NLP) tasks in addition to the WER. In particular, we introduce two measures related to morpho-syntactic and semantic aspects of transcribed words: 1) the POSER (Part-of-speech Error Rate), which should highlight the grammatical aspects, and 2) the EmbER (Embedding Error Rate), a measurement that modifies the WER by providing a weighting according to the semantic distance of the wrongly transcribed words. These metrics illustrate the linguistic contributions of the language models that are applied during a posterior rescoring step on transcription hypotheses.
