Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel emotion-aware clickbait generation attack that leverages stylistic transformations optimized for emotional impact, modeled within the Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) space. The approach aligns clickbait headlines with semantically similar social media posts using Sentence-BERT and generates stylistic rewrites via LLMs, quantifying the "Curiosity Gap" (CG) to measure the contribution of emotional activation to user curiosity. Experiments show that this emotion-aware stylization significantly degrades state-of-the-art clickbait classifiers, increasing misclassification rates by up to 30.63%.
Emotionally charged clickbait can now evade detection by existing systems with up to a 30% higher success rate, thanks to a new generation technique that optimizes for Valence-Arousal-Dominance.
Clickbait is characterized by disproportionately high emotional intensity relative to informational content, often reinforced by specific structural patterns. However, current research considers clickbait as a static textual phenomenon characterized by linguistic patterns and structural cues. Additionally, existing detection systems primarily rely on surface-level features of clickbait. This paper introduces an emotion-aware clickbait generation attack, where stylistic transformations are used to optimize emotional impact. We propose an emotion-aware framework based on the Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) space to model the emotional dynamics underlying clickbait generation for optimal user engagement. To simulate realistic attack scenarios, we align clickbait headlines with semantically similar social media posts using Sentence-BERT and generate multiple stylistic rewrites via Large Language Models (LLMs). Building on this, we define a Curiosity Gap (CG) function that computes clickbait's headline variation to the current post to quantify how emotional activation will contribute to user curiosity and evade the existing system found on social media. Experimental results demonstrate that emotion-aware stylization significantly degrades the performance of state-of-the-art classifiers, leading to misclassification rates of up to 2.58% to 30.63% on the base system.
